The reporting of multiple similar named objects that cannot be seen can be a little ... odd.
For example, some broken seats and some burned seats. If neither are visible "You can't see any seatss!" is reported.
This happens even when neither of the objects have been seen.
Whilst this reporting works some of the time more often than not is reads awkward/wrong. A more generic report would be welcome "You can't see any such thing." or "That's not something you can see." for example.
Using this more generic report would also make using text overrides easier in this circumstance.
Also ADRIFT shouldn't report that "You can't see any seatss!" is no seats have yet been seen ... potential spoilers.
ADRIFT is making a guess that the word "seats" is not plural, based on the article. I will be exposing "plural" as a property at some point in the future. For now, can you check whether the article was simple defined as "some" as this should correct it.
I have made a small improvement to the code here, so will reduce the priority.
The main reason for me asking for a more generic reply (maybe as an option) is that ADRIFT doesn't always get is right - the farmer's wife and the butcher's wife - you can's see any wifes.
Also - as I do - if the prefix/adjective is placed as a noun the results can be a little offputting - a red box and a red pen - you can's see any reds
Also a more generic reply would stop the 'potential spoliers' problem.
You can't see any ... funniness,
